Category Archives: Shemos

Parshas Va”airo

וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֶל משֶׁה וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו אֲנִי יְדֹוָד: וָאֵרָא אֶל אַבְרָהָם אֶל יִצְחָק וְאֶל יַעֲקֹב בְּאֵל שַׁדָּי וּשְׁמִי יְדֹוָד לֹא נוֹדַעְתִּי לָהֶם:וְגַם הֲקִמֹתִי אֶת בְּרִיתִי אִתָּם לָתֵת לָהֶם אֶת אֶרֶץ כְּנָעַן אֵת אֶרֶץ מְגֻרֵיהֶם אֲשֶׁר גָּרוּ בָהּ: וְגַם אֲנִי שָׁמַעְתִּי אֶת נַאֲקַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר מִצְרַיִם מַעֲבִדִים אֹתָם וָאֶזְכֹּר אֶת בְּרִיתִי:-שמות ו/ב-ה

It is written in the beginning of our parsha “And Elokim spoke to Moshe and said to him, “I am Hashem“. I appeared to Avraham, Yitzchok and Yaakov as Keil Shakai, but I did not make Myself known to them by My name, “Hashem” (Yud Kay Vuv Kay). I also established My covenant with them, to give them the land of Kanaan, the land in which they lived as sojourners. I have now heard the moaning of Bnei Yisroel because the Mitzriyim are holding them in bondage and I have remembered My covenant. (Shemos 6/2-5)

The author of Zera Baruch in his sefer Ta’am Man (printed 1739) writes that these four pessukim correspond to four arguments that Bnei Yisroel used to convince ax Hashem that they will be redeemed from Mitzrayim.

The first argument; Hashem gives reward to people who walk in His way. Since our Forefathers were great servants of Hashem then it was very reasonable that their children will reap the rewards of their ancestor’s obedience to Hashem.

The second argument; Hashem promised to redeem us.

The third argument; that Hashem made a covenant and swore that He will redeem us from Mitzrayim.

And the fourth argument; Bnei Yisroel own merits, independent of the merits of their forefathers.

The first possuk in which Hashem said, “I am Hashem” alludes to the first argument that Hashem rewards people who go in His ways. (Rashi in a few places in Chumash explains that the phrase, “I am Hashem” means that Hashem rewards people who follow his commandments.)

The second possuk that mentions that Hashem appeared to our forefathers as Kail Shakai alludes to the second argument that Hashem promised to redeem us like Rashi on this possuk points out.

The third possuk obviously refers to the third argument that Hashem made a covenant to take Bnei Yisroel out of Mitzrayim.

And the fourth possuk that says that Hashem heard our moaning refers to the fourth argument that Bnei Yisroel had their own merits to be redeemed.

Zera Shimshon asks why were all of these arguments needed? Wouldn’t any one of them been enough?

He explains that the argument that we should be redeemed in the merit of our forefathers was actually very weak because we didn’t go in the way of Avraham Yitzchak and Yaakov. We worshipped idols in Mitzrayim and we didn’t do milah. It is only reasonable that children reap the rewards of their ancestors when they act like those ancestors. Therefore the second argument was needed.

The second argument was also weak because even though Hashem promised to redeem us, Hashem is perfectly just, and therefore His attribute of Justice would constantly contest this promise.

This argument, though, was stronger than the first one because even though the promise could be disputed because of our bad conduct, Rashi (Shemos 3/11) writes that Hashem promised to give us the Torah and that it was this future receiving of the Torah that made this argument stronger.

However this still wasn’t strong enough to secure redemption because we were only promised to be redeemed after four hundred years of bondage. And since we were already on the forty ninth level of impurity and tummah, therefore if we would have waited for the promise to take hold we would already have been lost in the tummah of Mitzrayim and the promise would never have been able to take effect.

Because of this they had to argue that there was also an oath. The benefit of having an oath to be redeemed over only a promise can be understood according to the following halachos.

The halacha is that if a person makes an oath to pay a person by a certain day and that day is Shabbos he must pay the loan a day earlier, on Friday (Chosen Mishpat 73/7).

And even more that this. The Rema (Yorah Dayah 232) paskens that if a person made an oath to do something on a certain day or within a year, he must do it immediately or in the morning of the designated day of the oath in order that he won’t forget to do what he swore to do or he will not be able to fulfill his oath due to circumstances beyond his control.

Therefore the third argument that Hashem made an oath was needed in order that Hashem will redeem us before we reached the fiftieth level of tummah (just like one can not wait for the last minute to fulfill an oath).

We are still left to understand why the fourth argument, that we should be redeemed in our own merit, is needed?

To answer this question the Zera Shimshon asks another question.

If the oath that Hashem swore to redeem us was enough of a reason to be redeemed earlier than the four hundred years that was originally decreed in the Bris Bein Habesorrim, why do Chazal tell us that the severity of our suffering made it as if we were in bondage for the full four hundred years? Why isn’t the fact that there was an oath enough of a reason to be redeemed early?

He answers that even though the oath secured our leaving Mitzrayim early, the Mitzriyim would not have been punished and destroyed. In the Bris Bein Habesorrim Hashem promised the oppressors of Bnei Yisroel to be punished only after four hundred years. And if Mitzrayim would not have been destroyed then our redemption would have not been complete.

Therefore the fourth argument, that we deserve to be redeemed in our own merit, was needed in order to have the Mitzriyim punished for their actions so that we could have a total redemption.

———————————————-2———————————————-

(יב) וַיְדַבֵּר משֶׁה לִפְנֵי יְדֹוָד לֵאמֹר הֵן בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא שָׁמְעוּ אֵלַי וְאֵיךְ יִשְׁמָעֵנִי פַרְעֹה וַאֲנִי עֲרַל שְׂפָתָיִם:-שמות ו/יב

Behold B’nei Yisroel didn’t listen to me, so why will Paroah listen to me, and I have blocked lips. (Shemos 6/12)

Rashi explains that this is one of 10 kal v’chomers that are mentioned in the Torah. Meaning, Moshe tried to convince Hashem that there was no purpose for him tell Paroah to free the Jewish nation because if B’nei Yisroel who were suffering, and would gain by being redeemed, didn’t believe Moshe  likes it says, “and Bnei Yisroel didn’t listen to Moshe (because) of their short breath and difficult labor” (Shemos 6/9) , then surely Paroah, who will lose by B’nei Yisroel being redeemed, won’t believe him.

Zera Shimshon asks that  the kal v’chomer seems to be faulty. The reason that B’nei Yisroel didn’t listen to Moshe was because of “shortness of breath and difficult labor”. Paroah, on the other hand, didn’t work hard at all. Why, then, should he not believe Moshe?

To answer this, Zera Shimshon points out something very interesting; whenever  the Torah mentions that Hashem will redeem us, the difficulty and pain of the enslavement is also mentioned.

“Why does the Torah do this?”, he asks. Hashem decreed at the Bris Bein HaBesarim that we would be slaves for 400 years. Therefore, if we were already slaves for 400 years then regardless of the fact that we suffered we are entitled to be saved? And if we weren’t yet slaves for 400 years, why will the fact that the servitude was so hard help to shorten the decree?

Zera Shimshon answers, that although according to the literal wording of the decree B’nei Yisroel should suffer enslavement for four hundred years, Hashem doesn’t only run the world according to pure justice. If H. would, then the world would not survive. Rather Hashem also manages the world with the Attribute of Mercy.

The Attribute of Mercy contends that the severity of the bondage should be taken into account and be used to reduce the four hundred year decree. The severity of the bondage is mentioned in connection with the redemption, because the tremendous suffering is what enabled to be redeemed and leave Mitzrayim after two hundred and ten years of bondage- 190 years early!

You shouldn’t make a mistake, though, and think that Hashem rules the world ONLY with the Attribute of Mercy. Hashem ALSO rules the world with the Attribute of Jutstice. Only Hashem really knows when and how to use both of these contridictory Attributes, but both are constantly being used.

According to this, Zera Shimshon explains  the kal v’chomer in the following way.

Hashem’s Attribute of Mercy argues that the difficulty of the enslavement can complete the decree of four hundred years of enslavement even though in reality we were slaves only for 210 years.

On the other hand,  Hashem’s Attribute of Justice claims that according to the strict letter of the promise we have to be slaves for 400 years- 365 days times 400.

B’nei Yisroel didn’t know which of these two attributes Hashem will chose to redeem them. However since they suffered so much and they still weren’t redeemed they figured that for some reason Hashem was judging them solely with the Attribute of Justice.

This, then, is the meaning of the posuk “and Bnei Yisroel didn’t listen to Moshe (because) of their short breath and hard work”. It doesn’t mean, like we orginally thought, that they didn’t listen to Moshe because of difficult emotional state caused by “shortness of breath and hard work”.

Rather Moshe argued that they didn’t beleive that they would be redeemed early BECAUSE of the pain and torture of  “shortness of breath and hard labor” but would have to wait until all four hundred years of slaverly finished.

This then is  the kal v’chomer; if B’nei Yisroel, who would benefit from the redemption, reasoned that Hashem was judging them with Attribute of Justice, then Paroah would cerntainly feel that Hashem will judge them with H.s Attribute of Justice and therefore there is no reason for him to set them free. It has nothing to do with their emotional state!

In short, Hashem runs the world with two contradictory attributes; the Attribute of Mercy and the Attribute of Justice. Moshe told Bnei Yisroel that they are going to be redeemed early because Hashem’s Attribute of Mercy took all of their suffering into account. But they didn’t believe Moshe and reasoned that they were being judged with Pure Justice. Therefore Moshe told Hashem that if they think like that, certainly Paroah will think like that and there is no reason for him to go to Paroah and try to convince him to liberate B’nei Yisroel before the 400 years pass.

———————————————-3———————————————-

וַיָּשָׁב משֶׁה אֶל יְדֹוָד וַיֹּאמַר אֲדֹנָי לָמָה הֲרֵעֹתָה לָעָם הַזֶּה לָמָּה זֶּה שְׁלַחְתָּנִי:וּמֵאָז בָּאתִי אֶל פַּרְעֹה לְדַבֵּר בִּשְׁמֶךָ הֵרַע לָעָם הַזֶּה וְהַצֵּל לֹא הִצַּלְתָּ אֶת עַמֶּךָ:-שמות ה/כב-כג

“So Moshe returned to Hashem and said, “O Hashem! Why have Y-u harmed this people? Why have You sent me? 23. Since I have come to Pharaoh to speak in Your name, he (Pharaoh) has harmed this people, and You have not saved Your people.” (Shemos 5/22-23, end of last week’s parsha, Shemos)

And Elokim spoke to Moshe, and H. said to him, “I am Hashem . I appeared to Avrohom, to Yitzchok, and to Yaakov with [the Name] Kail Shakai, but [with] My name YHVH, I did not become known to them.” (Shemos 6/2-3, beginning of this week’s parsha)

Rashi explains that the last possuk (possuk 5/3) mentioned above teaches us that the promises that Hashem made to the Avos were given when Hashem manifested H.mself with the Name Kail Shakai and not when H. manifested H.mself with the name Y-H-V-H.

RE. Mizrachi explains that there is usually a difference between a promise made by Hashem when H. appears with the Name Kail Shakai and a promise made when H. manifests Himself with the name Y-H-V-H. In the latter case Hashem carries through with the promise even if we sin. On he other hand, a promise made when H. appears with the Name Kail Shakai is given on condition that we deserve it and that we do not sin.

Concerning Hashem’s promise to redeem Clal Yisroel from Mitzrayim, however, it was different. Even though it was promised to the Avos when Hashem manifested H.mself with the Name Kail Shakai, Hashem promised to to redeem us no matter what we do, regardless if we sin or not. The reason for this is that in addition to the promise Hashem also made a covenant (bris) to redeem us.

Zera Shimshon asks that since there is no difference, why indeed did Hashem promise with the Name Kail Shakei and not with the Name Y-H-V-H!

Secondly, since they are both the same, how is mentioning the difference considered reprimanding?

He answers that in the dialogue between Hashem and Moshe we find the answer!

Moshe complained that from the time that he came before Pharoah, the situation of the Jewish nation was worse than it was beforehand. In other words Moshe argued that Clal Yisroel shouldn’t have to suffer so much.

Hashem’s reprimanded Moshe for complaining about the harsh situation of Bnei Yisroel and that he should have been able to understand the reason for this by himself.

He should have noticed that H. didn’t promise to the Avos with the Name Y-H-V-H but with the Name K.Sh. He should have then asked himself, “since there is no difference, why indeed did Hashem promise with the Name Kail Shakei and not with the Name Y-H-V-H since there is no difference! (The same question that Zera Shimshon asked)

He then should have arrived at the conclusion, Y-H-V-H is used when Hashem relates to the world with mercy, the Name Kail Shakei, when H. deals with the world harshly, with stern judgement.

He should have then realized that since the original promise to the Avos was made when Hashem appeared in the Name Kail Shakei, there was some intrinsic needed reason for the suffering so there is no reason to complain.

HaRav Shimshon Nachmaini, author of Zera Shimshon lived in Italy about 300 years ago in the time of the Or HaChaim HaKodesh.

The Chida writes that he was a great Mekubal and wrote many sefarim including sefarim about practical kabbolo but asked that all of his sefarim be buried after he passes away except for Zera Shimshon and Niflaos Shimshon on Avos.

He had one child who died in his lifetime (hence the name Zera Shimshon) and in the preface he promises for people who learn his sefarim after he dies ... And your eyes will see children and grandchildren like the offshoots of an olive tree around your tables, wise and understanding with houses filled with all manner of good things... and wealth and honor......

If you are interested in buying your own copy of the Hebrew version of Zera Shimshon

Call 05271-66-450 in Eretz Yisroel

or

347-496-5657 in the U.S.A.

You can now  HEAR shiurim of Zera Shimshon on Kol Halashon:

In E. Yisroel: 073-2951-727 or 03-617-1111 and then press 1,1,3,24

In U.S.A. (718) 395-2440 and then press 2,6,4,24

_________________________
To have new D’vrei Torah sent directly to your inbox fill in boxes below:



Parshas VaYakhail

 

לֹא תְבַעֲרוּ אֵשׁ בְּכֹל משְׁבֹתֵיכֶם בְּיוֹם הַשַּׁבָּת:(שמות לה/ג)

The Rambam (Hilchos Shabbos 2/22) writes, “A person who is traveling in the desert and does not know which day is the Shabbos he should count six days and consider the seventh day as holy. He should recite Kiddush and recite Havdalah at the conclusion of this day of “Shabbos“. Every day, even on the day on which he recites Kiddush and after which he recites Havdalah, he is allowed to earn only enough for his livelihood, so that he will not die…”

In other words the Rambam teaches us three halachos for someone who is lost in the desert and doesn’t know the day of the week.

Firstly, on no day that he is in the desert can he do more melachos (work) than he needs to survive.

Secondly, he counts six days and on the next day he makes kiddush and havdalah as if was Shabbos.

And thirdly, even on that day that he designated to be Shabbos he is also allowed to do all of the melachos that he needs to survive.

Zera Shimshon writes that there is an allusion to this halacha in our parsha.

It is written in our parsha (Shemos 35/3), “You shall not kindle fire in any of your dwelling places on Shabbos.” Seemingly the phrase “in any of your dwelling places” is extra? One must keep Shabbos wherever he is.

Zera Shimshon explains that this phrase alludes to the above halacha. Only in your dwelling places one shouldn’t kindle a fire. However if one is in the desert, and doesn’t know what day of the week it is, he is allowed to kindle a fire even on the day that he designated to be Shabbos!

Zera Shimshon points out another allusion to this halacha in the Ten Commandments.

It is written there, “(9) Six days may you work and perform all your labor. (10) But the seventh day is Shabbos to Hashem, your L.rd ; you shall perform no labor, neither you, your son, your daughter…”. Zera Shimshon says that possuk 10 is not a halacha independent of possuk 9 but it is continuation of it. Meaning, in a situation when, “Six days may you work and perform all your labor. then “…the seventh day is Shabbos to Hashem, your L.rd ; you shall perform no labor”.

However when six days you may NOT work and perform ALL of you labor (for instance, you are in the desert etc.) then there is no prohibition to perform no labor.

2

(א) וַיַּקְהֵל משֶׁה אֶת כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם אֵלֶּה הַדְּבָרִים אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְדֹוָד לַעֲשׂת אֹתָם: (ב) שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים תֵּעָשֶׂה מְלָאכָה וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי יִהְיֶה לָכֶם קֹדֶשׁ שַׁבַּת שַׁבָּתוֹן לַידֹוָד כָּל הָעֹשֶׂה בוֹ מְלָאכָה יוּמָת: (ג) לֹא תְבַעֲרוּ אֵשׁ בְּכֹל משְׁבֹתֵיכֶם בְּיוֹם הַשַּׁבָּת: (ד) וַיֹּאמֶר משֶׁה אֶל כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר זֶה הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְדֹוָד לֵאמֹר: (ה) קְחוּ מֵאִתְּכֶם תְּרוּמָה לַידֹוָד כֹּל נְדִיב לִבּוֹ יְבִיאֶהָ אֵת תְּרוּמַת יְדֹוָד זָהָב וָכֶסֶף וּנְחשֶׁת: (שמות לה/א-ה)

“Six days you should work and the seventh day will be holy, a complete rest-day for the sake of Hashem. Whoever does work will be killed (by Bais Din).  And Moshe told to the whole community of Bnei Yisroel….Take from them donations (for the mishkan) (Shemos 35/1-5)

Rashi explains that the reason that the Torah wrote the mitzvah of Shabbos immediately before discussing the mitzvah of collecting for and the building of the mishkan is to teach us that we have to keep Shabbos and not do any melachos even when we build the Mishkan. In other words.

Zera Shimshon asks why would think that the mitzvah of building the Mishkan overrides the mitzvah of Shabbos that the Torah wrote the mitzvah of Shabbos out of place to teach us that this is not the case?

He begins his answer by establishing that Rashi cannot be understood literally. The possuk is definitely NOT needed to teach us that the building of the Mishkan itself does not override Shabbos. A mitzvah overrides another mitzvah only when we cannot observe both of them. However, if it is possible to do one mitzvah without transgressing another one we must keep both of them.

Therefore, since we finished building all the parts of the  Mishkan on the 25th of Kislev (the date of Chanukah) and it wasn’t erected until Rosh Chodesh Nisan there was no reason to hasten its building, and therefore there is no reason to think that we desecrate Shabbos to build it.

Rather, contends Zera Shimshon, Rashi is referring to a situation that the mishkan or mizbayach broke and therefore we are unable to bring the sacrifices of Shabbos (for instance, the korbon tamid and the korbon mussaf). In such a situation we could erroneously think hat just like bringing the special korbonos of Shabbos overrides the mitzvos of Shabbos (for instance it is permitted to shect the korbon) so to all preliminary preparations, such as fixing the mishkan or mizbayach are also permitted.

The Torah therefore positioned the mitzvah of Shabbos immediately before the mitzvah of the Mishkan to teach us that although the korbonos of Shabbos take precedence over Shabbos the fixing of the Mishkan or any part of it even does not, even if leaving it broken will prevent us from bringing the korbonos.

3

 וַיַּקְהֵל משֶׁה אֶת כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם אֵלֶּה הַדְּבָרִים אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְדֹוָד לַעֲשׂת אֹתָם:  שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים תֵּעָשֶׂה מְלָאכָה וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי יִהְיֶה לָכֶם קֹדֶשׁ שַׁבַּת שַׁבָּתוֹן לַידֹוָד כָּל הָעֹשֶׂה בוֹ מְלָאכָה יוּמָת:(שמות לה/א-ב)

And Moshe gathered the whole assembly of Bnei Yisroel and said to them these are the words that Hashem commanded you to do. Six days you should work and the seventh day will be holy, a complete rest-day for the sake of Hashem. Whoever does work will killed (by Bais Din). ( Shemos 35/1-2)

Rashi explains that Moshe gathered Bnei Yisroel the day right after he came down from Har Sinai.

The Meforshim ask why were the laws of Shabbos the first mitzvo that Moshe taught Bnei Yisroal and not some other mitzvo? Seemingly he should have immediately taught them the mitzvo to build the Mishkan since it was on that day that he started to take contributions to build it.

Zera Shimshon begins his answer by quoting four Gemorros that show us the importance and significance of keeping Shabbos.1)Rav Yehuda said in the name of Rav, “If Yisroel would have kept the first Shabbos no nation would have been able to rule over them.” (Shabbos 118/B)

2) Rebbi Chiya bar Aba said in the name of Rebbi Yochanan, “Whoever observes Shabbos properly, even if he worships idols like they did in the generation of Enosh, Hashem will forgive him” (ibid).

3) Rebbi Yochanan said in the name of Rebbi Shimon ben Yochai, “If Yisroel would keep two Shabossos properly, they would immediately be redeemed.” (ibid)

4) If Bnei Yisroel didn’t worship the Golden Calf no nation could rule over them. (Avodah Zora 5A)

In light of these four Gemorros, Zera Shimshon explains that after Bnei Yisroel sinned by worshiping the Golden Calf,  Moshe put in tremendous effort to davven that Hashem will forgive them.

Therefore the first thing that he told Bnei Yisroel when he came down from the mountain was that if they would have kept Shabbos properly all of this would have been avoided. This is in light of the Gemorro, quoted above, that the proper observance of Shabbos atones even for the avairo of Avodah Zorro.

Another reason that he immediately taught them the halachos of Shabbos is that  to observe Shabbos properly is even more effective than Moshe’s prayers!

Rashi in last week’s parsha writes that Moshe’s prayers didn’t bring about full atonement. Even today, a part of our suffering under the nations of the world is in order to completely cleanse us from the avairo of the Golden Calf.

On the other hand, to properly observe Shabbos saves us completely from other nations!

Zera Shimson concludes and explains why he taught the importance of keeping Shabbos before the commandment of building he Mishkan  is because the Mishkan is collateral and security that we will keep the mitzvos.

If we don’t keep the Mitzvos like we should then Hashem takes it away from us (mashkon” in Hebrew means collateral.)

Therefore, Moshe taught the people that in order that their work to build the Mishkan will last forever, they should observe Shabbos properly to bring the final geulo.

HaRav Shimshon Nachmaini, author of Zera Shimshon lived in Italy about 300 years ago in the time of the Or HaChaim HaKodesh.

The Chida writes that he was a great Mekubal and wrote many sefarim including sefarim about practical kabbolo but asked that all of his sefarim be buried after he passes away except for Zera Shimshon and Niflaos Shimshon on Avos.

He had one child who died in his lifetime (hence the name Zera Shimshon) and in the preface he promises for people who learn his sefarim after he dies ... And your eyes will see children and grandchildren like the offshoots of an olive tree around your tables, wise and understanding with houses filled with all manner of good things and wealth and honor

These d’vrai Torah are dedicated to Esther Yenta Bas Chana Chassia. In the merit of the learning Zera Shimshon’s divrai TorahHashem should answer her prayers and she should quickly find her proper match along with all the other members of Clal Yisroel who are also looking for their zivug hagun.
_________________________
To have new D’vrei Torah sent directly to your inbox fill in boxes below: